Well. Where do we go from here?
For various reasons (possibly all of them engineered by Neurocam), the blogging operatives -- myself included -- have gone from babble to mumble to mute. Why? There seems to be this notion circulating that Neurocam operatives who operate under a strict policy of non-disclosure enjoy a "different" (implication: better) Cam experience.
Is this true? I don't know. Neurocam has gone on the record as preferring discretion from its operatives, and has progressively clarified its definition of "discretion" as leaks occur. I agree with others who have mused that these most recent assignments have been a test of the gaskets; a culling game. But was this strategy also intended to stifle all other manner of disclosure about the Cam?
Based on past conversation with Bridget Fischer, my guess is no. So I asked her. This is what she says:
I hereby inform you that your supposition that Neurocam does
not intend to fully suppress all discussion on operational matters is
correct.
Do operatives who maintain a verbal and written “silence” regarding their
Neurocam activities enjoy a different Neurocam experience? They certainly
do. Does “different”, however, equal “better”? Not necessarily.
I feel that Neurocam has been quite consistent in informing operatives as
to when and how operational matters may be discussed. The varying secrecy
clauses contained within assignment briefs are written in a concise and
clear manner, but, it should be noted, refer only to the discussion of
that particular assignment. Discussion on other matters is permitted and
encouraged, except in the instance where Neurocam has clearly expressed a
desire to the contrary.
Whilst on the matter of assignment secrecy, however, I would like to make
a point – Those operatives who claim to enjoy the Neurocam experience, but
then publish materials which the organization has requested be kept
confidential, only ruin the experience for other operatives and
themselves.
Despite some speculation to the contrary, Neurocam’s operations are, due
to necessity, increasing in complexity. Whilst there is little harm in
the “leaks” which have occurred thus far, similar displays of indiscretion
could, during future assignments, have catastrophic repercussions.
I must stress, once again, that I refer only to materials which Neurocam
has expressly delineated as “classified”.
So there you have it. Next up: What the hell is Traverse? Still waiting for an answer to that one.